
BROWSE BY SECTOR
- Built environment
- Central government
- Defence Management
- Devolved government
- e-government
- Education
- Enterprise and innovation
- Finance and pensions
- Health and social care
- Home affairs
- International
- Local government
- Management and HR
- PFI and partnerships
- Procurement
- Science and technology
- Sustainable futures
- Transport
- Stakeholders
Angela Hawke- senior editor, Overseas Development Institute
VIEW MORE TESTIMONIALS
'Name and shame' young offenders
Tuesday, November 03, 2009"It could work, like the medieval system of putting offenders in stocks" was one comment on the proposal by Gordon Brown to 'name and shame' young offenders who are given Anti-Social Behaviour Orders (Asbos).
The plan is that every local authority will be told to publish names and photographs of offenders online and elsewhere.
Stressing that "the consequences for committing anti-social behaviour should be clear", Brown said: "The public have a right to receive information on local individuals who have blighted their communities. So this week I will set out plans to publicise the names and details of those people subject to anti-social behaviour orders, and other orders, using photographs, public leaflets and online."
He went on: "I'm proud of our record, but I will never be satisfied while a single British pensioner hesitates about going out, or a couple think twice before heading into the town centre for a meal. Britain's mainstream majority are rightly angry with the reckless minority."
Louise Burfitt-Dons, founder of the Act Against Bullying charity, said: "It's a bit like the medieval system of putting offenders in stocks. It could work."
HAVE YOUR SAY
I am a 3rd year Criminology and Sociology student. For my dissertation I will be looking into the desired need to make punishments more visual and public. Naming and shaming of offenders comes into the frame. And funnily enough my 2nd year project with a student in a set of stocks in the town centre being portrayed as a persistent youth shoplifter. What I can’t seem to decide is whether it is the public wanted to see something done to help lower crime or just to get retribution from the criminal itself. Would this help lower crime rates or would it just be more punishment and use the general public as another tool of the criminal justice system.
Ben Redman - High Wycombe/Bucks New University
Feature Updates
Email
Print
Digg
reddit
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious


