Public Service - analysis_opinion_debate

Cameron is backing new think tank

Thursday, November 26, 2009

A new think tank set up with the backing of the Tory party will focus on the 'broken society' and make recommendations for 'restoring community values'.

The ResPublica think tank is headed up by former theology lecturer Phillip Blond who is known as the 'red Tory' because he rejected Thatcherism and various other key Conservative beliefs.

Blond, who writes in the December issue of Public Servant magazine (Find out how to get your own copy here), is said to believe that community groups, volunteers and church leaders are the solution to problems in society and should be given more support and more powers.

Oliver Letwin, who is responsible for writing the Tories' general election manifesto, has been quoted as saying: "Blond's work is seminal. He's one of the most exciting thinkers around."

Reckoned by some to be a champion of the working class, Blond said recently: "It's about capitalising on our two biggest assets – the insight and dedication of front-line staff and the engagement and involvement of citizens and communities. The state has bailed out the banking system but has proved incapable of saving its own citizens from debt and servitude. Moreover, the state has arrested social mobility and destroyed the structures of working class advancement."

He also claimed that the government had destroyed the "respectable working class", adding: "In the absence of a common British narrative that unites all peoples and classes, proper respect for other cultures and traditions has collapsed into a state-sanctioned multiculturalism that has produced antagonistic communities and licensed the return of extremism and racism."

Cameron will be present at the launch of the new think tank but his spokesman insisted: "The fact that David Cameron is appearing at this event doesn't mean that he endorses all of Phillip Blond's views."

• Professor John Seddon has been announced as a member of the advisory board to the new think tank.
COMMENTS





YOUR COMMENT WILL BE APPROVED BY A MODERATOR
EMAILS WILL NOT BE SHOWN.

Can "The Ownership State" abolish public sector management?

Res Publica has produced a series of provocative ideas about real public concerns. This is to be welcomed. But there are serious reservations about the proposals so far.

Philip Blond argues that over the last 10 years public sector productivity has only risen by 3.4%, whereas private sector productivity has risen by 27.9% over the same period. Where these figures come from is not revealed. How productivity is measured is a complex business. What to measure, and what is measureable, raises a host of problems in both the private and public sectors. Toyota is an example given of cutting costs. I am not aware of recent research on Toyota; but my research on other Japanese firms showed cost cutting came from wages that were high relative to local wage rates, but low relative to national rates. Trade unions were not made very welcome either.

There is an attractive demand for "front line leadership". But this sits uneasily with "public sector experts" retained! Workers self management has a long history in Britain, and also in Yugoslavia under a socialist government. What one needs here is real world examples of what decisions front line managers can take; and those only experts could take; and how any conflict between these two groups could be resolved. One is left with a feeling that a strong local group could, or should win. The debate in the 1990's around communitarianism in America is instructive here. Specifically, how Catholic priests organised housing and employment, but only for "good" catholics.

The death of full time managers still seems a long way off.
Brendan Caffrey - www.whyworktoday.spaces.live.com/blog/