Public servants shouldn't obfuscate
Monday, November 30, 2009
Politicians and public servants should use language that's clear, honest and understandable, the Public Administration Select Committee has said.
The committee reckoned that too often government uses language that confuses or distorts meaning and this can be damaging because it can prevent the public from understanding policies and can even deter people from getting access to public services and benefits, especially the elderly and those with reading difficulties. Also, mistakes made when filling in self-assessment tax forms mean that around £300m tax goes unpaid every year.
The government should consider cases of misleading or confusing language which results in harm as 'maladministration', the committee said, which would mean people's complaints about poor official language would be treated on the same basis as other kinds of poor administration. And if government and public sector bodies didn't resolve the issue complaints about bad official language could be taken to the relevant ombudsman.
Committee chair Tony Wright said: "Good government requires good language, while bad language is a sign of poor government. Far too often, government uses language that obscures, confuses or evades. We propose that cases of bad official language should be treated as 'maladministration', as for any other type of poor administration. Complaints made on this basis must be dealt with properly. This would help ensure that government takes seriously its responsibility to use good, clear and understandable language."
Of course, this is not rocket science, everyone knows that you can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs; the main thing is for everyone to be singing from the same song sheet. Having run this idea up the flagpole the main thing is for everyone to realise this is not an exercise in ticking the boxes. However, it is important that an individual steps up to the plate, recognises we don’t have time for hand holding and puts all their ducks in line. And remember when it comes to costing proposals what we need is the ballpark figure.
Blair Mcpherson - Preston
Margaret Thatcher used to say one of her favourutye programmes was 'Yes Minister' as it was so true to life in Whitehall.
That said it all 25-30 years ago, and we have only realised now that vested interests civil service are served by 'ensuring that explanations of policy and initiatives are comprehensive and totally inclusive of the various elements impacting thereon, thereby ensuring clarity of thinking and decision making founded on the widest possible consideration of potential outcomes under all circumstances both now and in the future'
At least Sir Humphrey can rest relieved in his retirement, he need not fear being called back to office - unless to head a think tank on how to reduce confusion and introduce simple language into Government documents.
roy