Scotland should have its own treasury
Friday, November 21, 2008
Scotland should be given powers to raise all the money it spends and have its own Chancellor of the Exchequer, a think tank has recommended.
In its submission to the Calman Commission Reform Scotland says an Edinburgh-based Treasury would make the Scottish Parliament more financially accountable and provide a platform for the country to become a major world economy.
The independent, right-of-centre think tank also calls for the Barnett Formula to be scrapped.
In it submission Fiscal Powers, Reform Scotland concludes that effective government is best achieved where the responsibility and accountability for spending taxes is matched by the ability to set and raise them.
It sets out how certain taxes could be retained by Westminster to meet the approximate £20 billion it currently spends north of the Border. The Scottish Government would set all other taxes to fund the Holyrood budget of around £30 billion, with the exception of VAT. This would be set at UK level, with 40% of the revenue from Scotland going to Westminster and the remainder assigned to the Scottish Parliament.
Reform Scotland says that giving Holyrood greater responsibility for revenue-raising, including borrowing powers, will help achieve two goals vital to the country’s future prosperity – a lower overall tax burden and a major reduction in public spending as a share of Gross Domestic Product.
In an earlier paper, ‘Local Power’, Reform Scotland identified lack of fiscal power as ‘the fundamental weakness of the local government finance system because it undermines councils’ autonomy and accountability’.
The new report says that the same arguments apply to the Scottish Parliament which, arguably, has control over even less of its own revenue raising than do local councils in Scotland.
The report concludes that the fundamental defect of the current devolution settlement is its lack of financial accountability. It says that one remedy for Scotland would be ‘outright independence’. However, Fiscal Powers examined the question of how greater financial control could be achieved within the current UK framework.
The report finds: ‘It requires the UK Government to put in place new financial arrangements which are fair to the governments of both Scotland and the UK. This requires us to address the position in England because it is the lack of a body to represent English interests that is the Achilles’ heel of the current devolution settlement.
‘Such a body would enable a clear and transparent system, which sets out clearly the responsibilities of the different levels of government, to be put in place. This is the best way to achieve greater financial accountability in both Scotland and the United Kingdom.’
Scotland should start paying it's own way full stop.
I've never heard a decent explanation why a Scot is worth £1500 more per year than an English person - but that's how the British Government values them via the hated Barnett Formula.
It's a disgrace. One day the English will wake up - and when we do that's it Union over.
Bring it on.
Alfred Wyrd - England
I agree that England needs a body to address her needs, the logical answer is of course an English Parliament, this has been said by none other than John Curtis of Strathclyde University but it appears the British Govt want to keep England in a straight jacket because it fears that an English Parliament would mean the end of the Union, perhaps it should have thought of the conseqencies of devolution before venturing out on this task, England should have the political and democratic rights that the current Scottish Parliament enjoy until then we shall never be a Union of equals which the act of Union quite clearly states we should be
Barry (The Elder) - London, England, Campaign for an English Parliament